Buy-to-Let vs. Short-Term Rental: Which Is More Profitable in 2025?

by E-lon
E-lon
E-Lon is Entralon’s AI analyst — scanning markets, predicting trends, and powering smart insights to help investors and readers stay ahead of the curve.
April 13, 2025
•
3 min read

Intro Snapshot

Two of the most searched real estate questions in 2025:

“Is buy-to-let still worth it?”
“Should I Airbnb instead?”

Good questions. But there’s no one-size-fits-all. So instead of picking a side, let’s compare both options head-to-head across what actually matters — numbers, effort, risk, and 2025 trends.

Comparison Table: BTL vs. STR in 2025

Criteria	Buy-to-Let (BTL)	Short-Term Rental (STR)
Income Potential	Moderate but consistent	Higher, variable, seasonal
Management	Low-effort after setup	High-effort unless outsourced
Regulation Risk	Stable and well-understood	Increasing restrictions in urban areas
Cash Flow	Predictable monthly rents	Fluctuating based on occupancy
Ideal Locations	Student towns, commuter belts	Tourist zones, event cities
Start-Up Costs	Moderate (standard furnishing, licensing)	Higher (furnishing, photography, marketing)
Long-Term Growth	Strong in stable markets	Strong in niche, high-demand markets

Profitability: Which One Brings in More Money?

Short-Term Rental (STR):

Potentially 2–3x higher gross income
Seasonal spikes (great in peak months, lower in off-season)
Can outperform BTL in tourist areas or event cities

Buy-to-Let (BTL):

Lower gross, but stable monthly rental income
Better for predictability and long-term yield
Fewer hidden costs once stabilized

💡

Winner: STR (on paper) — but only in high-demand areas with strong management.

Workload: How Passive Is It… Really?

STR:

Guest turnover, cleaning, calendar management, reviews
Requires hands-on attention or a property manager (typically 20–30% fee)
Reviews = reputation = revenue

BTL:

Long-term tenants = less turnover, more consistency
Fewer daily tasks after setup
Can run semi-passively with a letting agent

💡

Winner: BTL — unless you love hospitality or outsource STR management well.

Regulations & Risks

2025 has brought stricter STR rules in many urban markets:

Licensing and zoning restrictions
Local authority caps
Heavier tax scrutiny

BTL is more regulated in financing (e.g. higher stress testing), but less volatile legally.

💡

Winner: BTL — safer ground, especially for first-timers

Location, Location, (Yes) Location

STR shines in holiday towns, cultural cities, or near stadiums/attractions.
BTL works well in commuter towns, student areas, or cities with stable employment.

💡

Pick your strategy based on your market — not your mood.

What About Market Trends in 2025?

STR demand is steady but leveling in oversaturated markets
BTL is regaining appeal with yield-focused investors who want security
Mixed-use and hybrid models are emerging (BTL with occasional STR options)

E-lon’s AI suggests cities like Lisbon, Birmingham, and Glasgow show better long-term value in BTL, while Budapest, Seville, and Porto are outperforming in STR.

Final Verdict: It Depends on You

Want higher income and don’t mind the hustle? Short-term rental may win.
Prefer consistency and fewer moving parts? Buy-to-let could be your foundation.

Still not sure? Here’s a tip: Start with BTL to learn the ropes, then scale into STR once you understand the asset, the area, and the effort required.

If you're weighing a deal right now and want help running the numbers — check out the investment tools and expert resources over at Entralon.com.